Book Cover

Dysfluent in Fiction

Vocal Disability and Nineteenth-Century Literature

Riley McGuire

232 pp. 6 x 9
EXPECTED Pub Date: April, 2025

Subjects: Victorian Studies
Literary Studies, 19th-Century
Literary Studies, British & Irish
Disability Studies
Literary Studies, American

Preorder Hardcover $69.95   ISBN: 978-0-8142-1586-9

“McGuire deftly combines literary texts, biographical and historical sources, reception theory, and contemporary criticism to illuminate vocal disability not as a minor aspect of secondary characters but as a central facet of nineteenth-century narratives.” —Karen Bourrier, author of Victorian Bestseller: The Life of Dinah Craik

“A standout feature of Dysfluent in Fiction is that it stays true to the project of dysfluency—it refuses to reduce a study of vocal disability to a liberatory project that might overstate dysfluency’s resistance of fluent speech’s hegemonic and sovereign assumptions. An original, well-researched, nuanced treatment of a neglected subject.” —Amy R. Wong, author of Refiguring Speech: Late Victorian Fictions of Empire and the Poetics of Talk

In Dysfluent in Fiction, Riley McGuire unspools a literary history of vocal disability in the nineteenth century, arguing that this underexamined literary trope helps us to understand vocal hierarchies that still structure our present. Adopting the term “dysfluency” to show departure from normative expectations of pace, pitch, and fluency, McGuire reveals how dysfluent speech populates an enormous number of nineteenth-century texts and played a formative role in the lives of some of the period’s most influential writers.

Dysfluent in Fiction examines anglophone literature during the long nineteenth century in both England and America by authors such as William Makepeace Thackeray, Charlotte Brontë, Lewis Carroll, Mary Elizabeth Braddon, and Frederick Douglass. Examples of dysfluencies across genres include lisping lovers, a baby-talking fairy, a mute detective, various disabilities in narratives of enslavement, and more. These representations show how disabled speech was both stigmatized and celebrated in ways that clarify our contemporary response to the spectrum of human articulation and that are a vocal corollary to current notions of neurodiversity. Dysfluency’s power, McGuire contends, lies in its denial that a single mode of articulation is possible, let alone desirable.

Related Titles: